From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mguertin@macdiscussion.com>
Message-ID: <42711DCA.4090404@macdiscussion.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:30:50 -0400
From: Mark Guertin <mguertin@macdiscussion.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <20050428153733.GD1221@smtp.west.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050428153733.GD1221@smtp.west.cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: rsync mirrors of linuxppc-* on source.mvista.com
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Hi Tom

I know of quite a few setups that still use these trees, so they might 
be worth keeping around for that sake at the least if it's not too much 
work.

Mark

Tom Rini wrote:

>With the shift away from BitKeeper, and with PowerPC work having long
>shifted away from the linuxppc-* bitkeeper trees and towards a more
>direct relationship with Andrew / et al, is there any value in keeping
>the rsync mirrors of the last state of the linuxppc-* trees available?
>
>As there's no metadata, my slant is towards no.  But it wouldn't be hard
>to have these still exist, if people speak up.
>
>Thanks.
>
>  
>