From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dev.rtsoft.ru (RT-soft-2.Moscow.itn.ru [80.240.96.70]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CC16679E0 for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 17:44:07 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <42884F42.7090706@ru.mvista.com> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 11:44:02 +0400 From: Vitaly Bordug MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Allen Curtis References: <000601c557de$99627550$6601a8c0@D35HH141> <757b7fc162262dae582e1d85b6f36e62@freescale.com> <541a45636bdf88d9eb3c08febd63d5c5@onz.com> In-Reply-To: <541a45636bdf88d9eb3c08febd63d5c5@onz.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded list Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2] Freescale 8272ADS PCI bridge support to the List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Allen, Some details about 8272 PCI below... Allen Curtis wrote: > Is the patch necessary? In the March archive it appears that people > were using the standard 8260 PCI support. What is the issue? Perhaps I > could provide a patch to m8260_pci.c (as you suggested) > The point is that stuff existent in the current tree for the 82xx has limited functionality. Take a look at http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-April/017948.html. Current source _does not_ contain any IRQ handlers & demux (which the patch adds), so the device will remain malfunction. Also the patch has some 8272 & PQ2FADS - specific bits. >>> Where can I find the kernel tree with this integrated? >> >> >> One doesn't exist. >> > Is there an embedded 2.5/2.6 tree somewhere? (I know about the > bkbits.net/ppc/linux-2.5 tree > There is no special `embedded` tree - use one from kernel.org or git repo if you need development version (http://www.kernel.org/git/). -- Sincerely, Vitaly