From: Nick Barendt <nbarendt@vxitech.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: MPC5200 Rev. B
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:41:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42D2AF46.9000200@vxitech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.1.20050711112652.02b82cc8@mail.int.acdstar.com>
Eric N. Johnson (ACD) wrote:
> mgberry@ellipticity.com wrote:
>
>> Has anyone experienced any issues with the Rev. B silicon for the
>> MPC5200. We are seeing Linux hanging and are suspecting the SDRAM
>> errata for Rev. B. If we disable the cache this seems to improve but
>> will still crash over time in heavy loads. We have not seen any of
>> these type issues with the original rev.
>
>
> Are you sure you have revision B of the MPC5200? Freescale has
> announced a "B" version, but I don't believe that any of them have hit
> the public yet. There may be some engineering grade samples out
> there. (Let me know if you really do have "B" parts. Freescale has
> been telling me "real soon now" since last year)
I can confirm that there are engineering samples of at least the first
mask set of the Rev. B part floating around. A friend sent me one:
PPC5200CVR400 mask set M08A.
Our local rep has hemming and hawing, too, which is getting very
frustrating, knowing that other developers have had silicon in there
hands for some time, and that several of the errata on the L25R mask set
(PCI DMA arbitration, among them) have been causing us some serious
headaches.
We have had very limited success with the Rev B engineering part,
populated on a custom board. Basically locking up at boot time when the
DDR is enabled. We're trying to isolate the problem to a hardware
(board/part damaged) or software (are there changes to the memory
controller configuration required for the Rev. B?).
We do know that there are still errata on the first mask rev and that a
second mask rev is in process.
Anyone else have anything to report?
-Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-11 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-11 15:39 MPC5200 Rev. B mgberry
2005-07-11 16:43 ` Eric N. Johnson (ACD)
2005-07-11 17:41 ` Nick Barendt [this message]
2005-07-11 19:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-11 18:13 mgberry
2005-07-12 13:25 Matt_Berry
2005-07-12 20:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-07-13 14:30 Matt_Berry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42D2AF46.9000200@vxitech.com \
--to=nbarendt@vxitech.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).