From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70DF9DDF90 for ; Sat, 9 May 2009 04:43:37 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <42E5BD30-8DF6-4911-B331-558BAB96968B@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala To: dhlii@dlasys.net In-Reply-To: <4A0457BC.3040408@dlasys.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: device trees. Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:43:20 -0500 References: <4A0457BC.3040408@dlasys.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , you can look at the source to SLOF or u-boot to see cases of building nodes on the fly. - k On May 8, 2009, at 11:03 AM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote: > Is there an example somewhere that shows building a device tree on > the fly ? > > As our products move forward it becomes increasingly clear that > static configurations are not going to work. > > > > > -- > Dave Lynch DLA Systems > Software Development: Embedded Linux > 717.627.3770 dhlii@dlasys.net http://www.dlasys.net > fax: 1.253.369.9244 Cell: 1.717.587.7774 > Over 25 years' experience in platforms, languages, and technologies > too numerous to list. > > "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It > takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the > opposite direction." > Albert Einstein > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev