LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: ira.weiny@intel.com, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/pkeys: Standardize on u8 for pkey type
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 16:49:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42e0aa73-04c8-a4c2-2d64-80812634b627@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220311005742.1060992-6-ira.weiny@intel.com>

On 3/10/22 16:57, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> 
> The number of pkeys supported on x86 and powerpc are much smaller than a
> u16 value can hold.  It is desirable to standardize on the type for
> pkeys.  powerpc currently supports the most pkeys at 32.  u8 is plenty
> large for that.
> 
> Standardize on the pkey types by changing u16 to u8.

How widely was this intended to "standardize" things?  Looks like it may
have missed a few spots.

Also if we're worried about the type needing to change or with the wrong
type being used, I guess we could just to a pkey_t typedef.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-14 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-11  0:57 [PATCH 0/5] Pkey User clean up patches ira.weiny
2022-03-11  0:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/pkeys: Clean up arch_set_user_pkey_access() declaration ira.weiny
2022-03-11  0:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/pkeys: Remove __arch_set_user_pkey_access() declaration ira.weiny
2022-03-11  0:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/pkeys: Properly type pkey in init_{i}amr() ira.weiny
2022-03-11  0:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/pkeys: Make pkey unsigned in arch_set_user_pkey_access() ira.weiny
2022-03-11  0:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/pkeys: Standardize on u8 for pkey type ira.weiny
2022-03-14 23:49   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2022-03-15 15:53     ` Ira Weiny
2022-03-15 16:03       ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-15 16:57         ` Ira Weiny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42e0aa73-04c8-a4c2-2d64-80812634b627@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox