From: Peter Ryser <peter.ryser@xilinx.com>
To: Andrei Konovalov <akonovalov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for TLB errata on early Xilinx Virtex-II Pro silicon
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:34:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43049C69.1060801@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43046011.60504@ru.mvista.com>
None of the ML300 will need this workaround as the core voltage is
slightly higher than recommended in the data sheet of Virtex-II Pro. An
increased core voltage is one way to fix the TLB problem in early parts
but it is not the right way as it can have a negative impact on other
V2P features.
Since the ML300 configuration is used as the base for other boards the
patch is still useful. However, all Virtex-II Pro FPGAs that are
shipping today are based on newer core versions and do not show the TLB
problem.
- Peter
Andrei Konovalov wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> Early versions of the Xilinx Virtex-II Pro have a TLB errata where
>> only even numbered TLB entries work correctly. Occurs on chips where
>> PVR == 0x20010820 || 0x20010860
>>
>> See Record #14052, solution #12 in the Xilinx answers database
>> http://www.xilinx.com/xlnx/xil_ans_display.jsp?getPagePath=14052
>>
>> This patch adds a config option to use only even TLB entries on the
>> V2Pro
>> It also makes a trivial change to the Kconfig so that Xilinx options
>> depend
>> on VIRTEX_II_PRO instead of XILINX_ML300
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@gdcanada.com>
>> ---
>>
>> arch/ppc/kernel/head_4xx.S | 11 +++++++++++
>> arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/Kconfig | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> 322a82cd190a777e4ebe728cad2a2a3759039260
>> diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_4xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_4xx.S
>> --- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_4xx.S
>> +++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_4xx.S
>> @@ -769,7 +769,11 @@ finish_tlb_load:
>> /* load the next available TLB index.
>> */
>> lwz r9, tlb_4xx_index@l(0)
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_VIRTEX_II_PRO_TLB_FIX)
>> + addi r9, r9, 2
>> +#else
>> addi r9, r9, 1
>> +#endif
>> andi. r9, r9, (PPC4XX_TLB_SIZE-1)
>> stw r9, tlb_4xx_index@l(0)
>
>
> I would also fix the comment in this file
> (it has nothing to do with the TLB fix but...):
>
> @@ -915,10 +919,10 @@ initial_mmu:
> mtspr SPRN_PID,r0
> sync
>
> - /* Configure and load two entries into TLB slots 62 and 63.
> - * In case we are pinning TLBs, these are reserved in by the
> + /* Configure and load an entry into TLB slot 63.
> + * In case we are pinning TLBs, it is reserved in by the
> * other TLB functions. If not reserving, then it doesn't
> - * matter where they are loaded.
> + * matter where it is loaded.
> */
> clrrwi r4,r4,10 /* Mask off the real page number */
> ori r4,r4,(TLB_WR | TLB_EX) /* Set the write and execute
> bits */
>
>> @@ -926,7 +930,14 @@ initial_mmu:
>> clrrwi r3,r3,10 /* Mask off the effective
>> page number */ ori r3,r3,(TLB_VALID | TLB_PAGESZ(PAGESZ_16M))
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_VIRTEX_II_PRO_TLB_FIX)
>> + /* Odd numbered TLB slots are broken on Xilinx V2Pro processors
>> + * where PVR = 20010820 | 20010860
>> + */
>> + li r0,62 /* TLB slot 62 */
>> +#else
>> li r0,63 /* TLB slot 63 */
>> +#endif
>>
>> tlbwe r4,r0,TLB_DATA /* Load the data portion of
>> the entry */ tlbwe r3,r0,TLB_TAG /* Load the tag
>> portion of the entry */
>> diff --git a/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/Kconfig
>> b/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/Kconfig
>> --- a/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/Kconfig
>> @@ -161,11 +161,6 @@ config IBM_OCP
>> depends on ASH || BAMBOO || BUBINGA || CPCI405 || EBONY ||
>> EP405 || LUAN || OCOTEA || REDWOOD_5 || REDWOOD_6 || SYCAMORE || WALNUT
>> default y
>>
>> -config XILINX_OCP
>> - bool
>> - depends on XILINX_ML300
>> - default y
>> -
>> config IBM_EMAC4
>> bool
>> depends on 440GX || 440SP
>> @@ -201,6 +196,27 @@ config VIRTEX_II_PRO
>> depends on XILINX_ML300
>> default y
>>
>> +config VIRTEX_II_PRO_TLB_FIX
>> + bool "Virtex-II Pro TLB bugfix"
>> + depends on VIRTEX_II_PRO
>> + default n
>> + help
>> + Early versions of the Xilinx Virtex-II Pro have a TLB
>> errata where
>> + only even numbered TLB entries work correctly. Say Y here if
>> + PVR == 0x20010820 || 0x20010860, or if your board crashes
>> early
>> + after enabling the MMU
>> +
>> + See Record #14052, solution #12 in the Xilinx answers database
>> +
>> http://www.xilinx.com/xlnx/xil_ans_display.jsp?getPagePath=14052
>> +
>> + It is safe to say Y here, but there is a performance impact.
>> + Say N if unsure.
>> +
>> +config XILINX_OCP
>> + bool
>> + depends on VIRTEX_II_PRO
>> + default y
>> +
>> config STB03xxx
>> bool
>> depends on REDWOOD_5 || REDWOOD_6
>> @@ -208,7 +224,7 @@ config STB03xxx
>>
>> config EMBEDDEDBOOT
>> bool
>> - depends on EP405 || XILINX_ML300
>> + depends on EP405 || VIRTEX_II_PRO
>> default y
>>
>> config IBM_OPENBIOS
>
>
> I would drop the last chunk.
> I agree that VIRTEX_II_PRO_TLB_FIX and XILINX_OCP should depend on the
> chip (VIRTEX_II_PRO), but using EMBEDDEDBOOT or, say, U-Boot is at least
> board specific. Well, even the same board can use different bootloaders,
> but tying together EMBEDDEDBOOT and VIRTEX_II_PRO is even worse IMO.
>
> Otherwise the patch looks OK.
>
> These changes to head_4xx.S were tested OK on ML300:
> in both cases (odd numbered TLB slots used or not) there were no
> problems.
> (For some unknown reason my ML300 doesn't need this workaround though
> 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' gets "revision : 8.32 (pvr 2001 0820)")
>
> Thanks,
> Andrei
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
>> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
>> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-18 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-17 20:05 [PATCH] Fix for TLB errata on early Xilinx Virtex-II Pro silicon Grant Likely
2005-08-18 10:16 ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-08-18 14:34 ` Peter Ryser [this message]
2005-08-18 15:03 ` Matt Porter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-18 19:04 Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43049C69.1060801@xilinx.com \
--to=peter.ryser@xilinx.com \
--cc=akonovalov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).