linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Williams <steve@icarus.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: How to map memory uncached on PPC.
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 08:59:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4307536E.4070800@icarus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1124499963.5197.99.camel@gaston>

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 08:17 -0700, Stephen Williams wrote:
>>I did some measurements, at it seems that the vast amount of
>>the time is spent in pci_map_single, which calls only the
>>consistent_sync function, which for FROMDEVICE calls only
>>invalidate_dcache_range. So I'm convinced that invalidating
>>the cache for the output buffer (which is large, in case the
>>image that arrives is large) is taking most of the time. So
>>I want to eliminate it.

> A simple experiment you can do is limit the memory used by the kernel
> (booting with mem=xxxx) and then use mmap of /dev/mem to map the
> remaining memory like if it was an IO device, uncached. With that, you
> get a quick hack solution to validate the performance benefit at least.

I did an even simpler experiment: I commented out the pci_map_single,
which on a PPC only has the effect of calling invalidate_dcache_range
and returning the virt_to_bus of the address. Obviously, the cache
is still enabled for the processor, and the image data may get
corrupted, but this was a performance test, not a solution.

Your "test" is a not implausible solution, although it has for me
some administrative problems.

-- 
Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com           But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com         and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-20 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-19 15:17 How to map memory uncached on PPC Stephen Williams
2005-08-20  1:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-20 15:59   ` Stephen Williams [this message]
2005-08-20 18:08     ` John W. Linville
2005-08-21 15:06       ` Stephen Williams
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-19 16:18 Stephen Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4307536E.4070800@icarus.com \
    --to=steve@icarus.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).