From: Peter Ryser <peter.ryser@xilinx.com>
To: Keith J Outwater <kjoutwater@raytheon.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Best kernel for Xilinx VirtexII Pro/PPC405 ?
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 07:33:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <430F2835.3090302@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF820ADBC7.FD07ABA9-ON07257061.00633C32-07257061.00641841@mck.us.ray.com>
Good to hear that you got everything working. Just as a note: XAPP542
(http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/appnotes/xapp542.pdf) contains a patch
for the Linux kernel to make it work together with U-Boot.
Does linuxppc-2.4 still accept patches?
- Peter
Keith J Outwater wrote:
>Hi Peter -
>Well, the good news is that it works, and works well. In my humble
>opinion, supporting it would be pretty simple, but I completely understand
>why RHEL is the supported distribution. I would much rather see effort
>put into polishing up EDK under Linux than in supporting every Linux
>distro out there.
>For me, the bottom line was this: do I want to migrate all of other
>development activities from FC4 to RHEL for the sake of EDK, or try to run
>EDK under FC4? I tried the latter approach, and now that the Jungo
>WinDriver v7.1 is out, parallel port debugging works by simply using
>WinDriver 7.1 and patching the Xilinx XPC4 parport driver.
>I now have the kernel booting on a Memec 2VP50 eval board using U-Boot as
>the bootloader. I used the linuxppc-2.4 kernel rsynced from MontaVista.
>That particular kernel did not have support for U-Boot but it did support
>the ML300 and a Memec 2VP40/2VP70 board. I had to modify the kernel to
>accept a board description structure from U-Boot and I added a new board
>type for my custom hardware.
>The approach I took was definitely the "roll your own approach", but then
>again I've done this (Linux board ports) a couple times and I know U-Boot
>well.
>Keith
>
>Peter Ryser <peter.ryser@xilinx.com> wrote on 08/18/2005 07:39:21 AM:
>
>
>
>>>I am running all of my development tools (EDK, ISE, ELDK, etc...)
>>>
>>>
>under
>
>
>>>Fedora Core 4, so I am looking for a publicly accessible kernel source
>>>tree that best supports the PPC405 in the Virtex II Pro.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Keep in mind that EDK and ISE are not "officially" supported on FC4.
>>Anyway, with EDK, ISE, and ELDK you seem to have all that is needed to
>>get started with Linux on Virtex-II Pro and Virtex-4.
>>
>>- Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-26 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-15 21:55 Best kernel for Xilinx VirtexII Pro/PPC405 ? Keith J Outwater
2005-08-16 4:15 ` Peter Ryser
2005-08-16 15:53 ` Keith J Outwater
2005-08-18 14:39 ` Peter Ryser
2005-08-18 18:13 ` Keith J Outwater
2005-08-26 14:33 ` Peter Ryser [this message]
2005-08-16 10:38 ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-08-16 15:48 ` Keith J Outwater
2005-08-16 16:15 ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-08-16 16:17 ` Keith J Outwater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=430F2835.3090302@xilinx.com \
--to=peter.ryser@xilinx.com \
--cc=kjoutwater@raytheon.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).