From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kleinhenz.com (kleinhenz.com [213.239.205.196]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EB268541 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:31:33 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <434BB09B.9070605@hogyros.de> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:31:23 +0200 From: Simon Richter MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Mackerras References: <17227.44943.714106.911471@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <17227.44943.714106.911471@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8A95C2DB3E0F68DB7EADAB70" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: merge progress List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8A95C2DB3E0F68DB7EADAB70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Paul Mackerras wrote: > I have just pushed out a new pile of commits to the powerpc-merge tree > on kernel.org. (It may take a little while for them to get mirrored > from master.kernel.org to ftp/rsync.kernel.org.) Should I fast-forward the APUS patches towards the merge tree, or is it better to apply them in the unmerged tree and merge them back into the merge tree from there? Simon --------------enig8A95C2DB3E0F68DB7EADAB70 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBQ0uwnVYr4CN7gCINAQKs2gP/UCwm2GfWpehq9HQEDh7tUmOK3PfyIrh8 F/1SuiExHDusUreI2FhbvL7MYsQBrlzlWHPU6KAyHDZeI41AT5cI7VBosAT640Xe wwWgUKrML1rhAvk3HwGmGp+/2hewDaF87lo379f49w0IjuAQtiNVw+D4DrjBP0kV 3R/hWHvUfnM= =a3WL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8A95C2DB3E0F68DB7EADAB70--