From: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: alistair@popple.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, dja@axtens.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/21] powerpc64: Add prefixed instructions to instruction data type
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 17:34:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <435c17d3180d560a723efcae42de351ae7152cb3.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406080936.7180-19-jniethe5@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 18:09 +1000, Jordan Niethe wrote:
> For powerpc64, redefine the ppc_inst type so both word and prefixed
> instructions can be represented. On powerpc32 the type will remain the
> same. Update places which had assumed instructions to be 4 bytes long.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
> ---
> v4: New to series
> v5: - Distinguish normal instructions from prefixed instructions with a
> 0xff marker for the suffix.
> - __patch_instruction() using std for prefixed instructions
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 31 ++++++++++--
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c | 42 ++++++++--------
> arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S | 3 ++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 26 +++++++++-
> arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 19 +++++---
> arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c | 5 +-
> arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c | 4 +-
> arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 6 +--
> arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon_bpts.S | 4 +-
> 12 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> index 70b37a35a91a..7e23e7146c66 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> @@ -8,23 +8,67 @@
>
> struct ppc_inst {
> u32 val;
> +#ifdef __powerpc64__
> + u32 suffix;
> +#endif /* __powerpc64__ */
> } __packed;
>
> -#define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = x })
> +static inline int ppc_inst_opcode(struct ppc_inst x)
> +{
> + return x.val >> 26;
why don't we wrap here and in `ppc_inst_opcode()` in patch 9 using
`ppc_inst_val()` ?
> +}
>
> static inline u32 ppc_inst_val(struct ppc_inst x)
There is another same definition below for the same function in
#else part of __powerpc64__ ifdef.
> {
> return x.val;
> }
>
> -static inline bool ppc_inst_len(struct ppc_inst x)
> +#ifdef __powerpc64__
> +#define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x), .suffix = 0xff })
> +
> +#define ppc_inst_prefix(x, y) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x), .suffix = (y)
> })
> +
> +static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
> {
> - return sizeof(struct ppc_inst);
> + return x.suffix;
> }
>
> -static inline int ppc_inst_opcode(struct ppc_inst x)
> +static inline bool ppc_inst_prefixed(struct ppc_inst x) {
> + return ((ppc_inst_val(x) >> 26) == 1) && ppc_inst_suffix(x) != 0xff;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
> {
> - return x.val >> 26;
> + return ppc_inst_prefix(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)),
> + swab32(ppc_inst_suffix(x)));
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const struct ppc_inst *ptr)
> +{
> + u32 val, suffix = 0xff;
> + val = *(u32 *)ptr;
> + if ((val >> 26) == 1)
> + suffix = *((u32 *)ptr + 1);
> + return ppc_inst_prefix(val, suffix);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ppc_inst_write(struct ppc_inst *ptr, struct ppc_inst x)
> +{
> + if (ppc_inst_prefixed(x)) {
> + *(u32 *)ptr = x.val;
> + *((u32 *)ptr + 1) = x.suffix;
> + } else {
> + *(u32 *)ptr = x.val;
can we wrap here as well with `ppc_inst_val()` and `ppc_inst_suffix()` ?
> + }
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +#define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = x })
> +
> +static inline bool ppc_inst_prefixed(ppc_inst x)
> +{
> + return 0;
Is it return !!0 or return false ?
> }
>
> static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
> @@ -32,14 +76,31 @@ static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct
> ppc_inst x)
> return ppc_inst(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)));
> }
>
> +static inline u32 ppc_inst_val(struct ppc_inst x)
[...] duplicate definition that is defined outside __powerpc64__ above.
> +{
> + return x.val;
> +}
> +
> static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const struct ppc_inst *ptr)
> {
> return *ptr;
> }
>
> +static inline void ppc_inst_write(struct ppc_inst *ptr, struct ppc_inst x)
> +{
> + *ptr = x;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* __powerpc64__ */
> +
> static inline bool ppc_inst_equal(struct ppc_inst x, struct ppc_inst y)
> {
> return !memcmp(&x, &y, sizeof(struct ppc_inst));
> }
>
> +static inline int ppc_inst_len(struct ppc_inst x)
> +{
> + return (ppc_inst_prefixed(x)) ? 8 : 4;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_INST_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
> index 66b3f2983b22..4fc0e15e23a5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ extern kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_ret[];
> extern kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_end[];
>
> /* Fixed instruction size for powerpc */
> -#define MAX_INSN_SIZE 1
> +#define MAX_INSN_SIZE 2
> #define MAX_OPTIMIZED_LENGTH sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t) /* 4 bytes */
> #define MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE (optprobe_template_end -
> optprobe_template_entry)
> #define RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t) /* 4 bytes */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index c0a35e4586a5..5a3f486ddf02 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -105,11 +105,34 @@ static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long size,
> #define __put_user_inatomic(x, ptr) \
> __put_user_nosleep((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
>
> -#define __get_user_instr(x, ptr) \
> - __get_user_nocheck((x).val, (u32 *)(ptr), sizeof(u32), true)
> +#define __get_user_instr(x, ptr) \
> +({ \
> + long __gui_ret = 0; \
> + unsigned int prefix, suffix; \
> + __gui_ret = __get_user(prefix, (unsigned int __user *)ptr);
> \
> + if (!__gui_ret && (prefix >> 26) == 1) { \
> + __gui_ret = __get_user(suffix, (unsigned int __user *)ptr + 1);
> \
> + (x) = ppc_inst_prefix(prefix, suffix); \
> + } else { \
> + (x) = ppc_inst(prefix); \
> + } \
> + __gui_ret; \
> +})
> +
> +#define __get_user_instr_inatomic(x, ptr) \
> +({ \
> + long __gui_ret = 0; \
> + unsigned int prefix, suffix; \
> + __gui_ret = __get_user_inatomic(prefix, (unsigned int __user *)ptr);
> \
> + if (!__gui_ret && (prefix >> 26) == 1) { \
> + __gui_ret = __get_user_inatomic(suffix, (unsigned int __user
> *)ptr + 1); \
> + (x) = ppc_inst_prefix(prefix, suffix); \
> + } else { \
> + (x) = ppc_inst(prefix); \
> + } \
> + __gui_ret; \
> +})
>
> -#define __get_user_instr_inatomic(x, ptr) \
> - __get_user_nosleep((x).val, (u32 *)(ptr), sizeof(u32))
> extern long __put_user_bad(void);
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h
> index 7e3b329ba2d3..5bf65f5d44a9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>
> typedef ppc_opcode_t uprobe_opcode_t;
>
> -#define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 4
> +#define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8
> #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES (MAX_UINSN_BYTES)
>
> /* The following alias is needed for reference from arch-agnostic code */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
> index 684640b8fa2e..689daf430161 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
> @@ -159,38 +159,38 @@ void patch_imm32_load_insns(unsigned int val,
> kprobe_opcode_t *addr)
>
> /*
> * Generate instructions to load provided immediate 64-bit value
> - * to register 'r3' and patch these instructions at 'addr'.
> + * to register 'reg' and patch these instructions at 'addr'.
> */
> -void patch_imm64_load_insns(unsigned long val, kprobe_opcode_t *addr)
> +void patch_imm64_load_insns(unsigned long val, int reg, kprobe_opcode_t
> *addr)
> {
> - /* lis r3,(op)@highest */
> - patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ADDIS |
> ___PPC_RT(3) |
> + /* lis reg,(op)@highest */
> + patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ADDIS |
> ___PPC_RT(reg) |
> ((val >> 48) & 0xffff)));
> addr++;
>
> - /* ori r3,r3,(op)@higher */
> - patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORI |
> ___PPC_RA(3) |
> - ___PPC_RS(3) | ((val >> 32) & 0xffff)));
> + /* ori reg,reg,(op)@higher */
> + patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORI |
> ___PPC_RA(reg) |
> + ___PPC_RS(reg) | ((val >> 32) & 0xffff)));
> addr++;
>
> - /* rldicr r3,r3,32,31 */
> - patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_RLDICR |
> ___PPC_RA(3) |
> - ___PPC_RS(3) | __PPC_SH64(32) | __PPC_ME64(31)));
> + /* rldicr reg,reg,32,31 */
> + patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_RLDICR |
> ___PPC_RA(reg) |
> + ___PPC_RS(reg) | __PPC_SH64(32) | __PPC_ME64(31)));
> addr++;
>
> - /* oris r3,r3,(op)@h */
> - patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORIS |
> ___PPC_RA(3) |
> - ___PPC_RS(3) | ((val >> 16) & 0xffff)));
> + /* oris reg,reg,(op)@h */
> + patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORIS |
> ___PPC_RA(reg) |
> + ___PPC_RS(reg) | ((val >> 16) & 0xffff)));
> addr++;
>
> - /* ori r3,r3,(op)@l */
> - patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORI |
> ___PPC_RA(3) |
> - ___PPC_RS(3) | (val & 0xffff)));
> + /* ori reg,reg,(op)@l */
> + patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORI |
> ___PPC_RA(reg) |
> + ___PPC_RS(reg) | (val & 0xffff)));
> }
>
> int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe
> *p)
> {
> - struct ppc_inst branch_op_callback, branch_emulate_step;
> + struct ppc_inst branch_op_callback, branch_emulate_step, temp;
> kprobe_opcode_t *op_callback_addr, *emulate_step_addr, *buff;
> long b_offset;
> unsigned long nip, size;
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe
> *op, struct kprobe *p)
> * Fixup the template with instructions to:
> * 1. load the address of the actual probepoint
> */
> - patch_imm64_load_insns((unsigned long)op, buff + TMPL_OP_IDX);
> + patch_imm64_load_insns((unsigned long)op, 3, buff + TMPL_OP_IDX);
>
> /*
> * 2. branch to optimized_callback() and emulate_step()
> @@ -271,7 +271,11 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct
> optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *p)
> /*
> * 3. load instruction to be emulated into relevant register, and
> */
> - patch_imm32_load_insns(*p->ainsn.insn, buff + TMPL_INSN_IDX);
> + temp = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)p->ainsn.insn);
> + patch_imm64_load_insns(ppc_inst_val(temp) |
> + ((u64)ppc_inst_suffix(temp) << 32),
did we check building for ppc32 ?
I doubt we might hit build failure as `ppc_inst_suffix()` macro is not defined.
> + 4,
> + buff + TMPL_INSN_IDX);
>
> /*
> * 4. branch back from trampoline
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
> index cf383520843f..ff8ba4d3824d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ optprobe_template_insn:
> /* 2, Pass instruction to be emulated in r4 */
> nop
> nop
> + nop
> + nop
> + nop
>
> .global optprobe_template_call_emulate
> optprobe_template_call_emulate:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index e78742613b36..16041a5c86d5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -41,11 +41,35 @@
> #define NUM_FTRACE_TRAMPS 8
> static unsigned long ftrace_tramps[NUM_FTRACE_TRAMPS];
>
> +#ifdef __powerpc64__
> static long
> probe_kernel_read_inst(struct ppc_inst *inst, const void *src)
> {
> - return probe_kernel_read((void *)inst, src, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
> + u32 val, suffix = 0;
don't we need to initialize suffix with 0xff ?
> + long err;
> +
> + err = probe_kernel_read((void *)&val,
> + src, sizeof(val));
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if ((val >> 26) == 1)
> + err = probe_kernel_read((void *)&suffix,
> + src + 4, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + *inst = ppc_inst_prefix(val, suffix);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> +#else
> +static long
> +probe_kernel_read_inst(struct ppc_inst *inst, const void *src)
> +{
> + return probe_kernel_read((void *)inst, src, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE)
> +}
> +#endif
>
> static struct ppc_inst
> ftrace_call_replace(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr, int link)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-
> patching.c
> index c329ad657302..b4007e03d8fa 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> @@ -24,12 +24,19 @@ static int __patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst
> *exec_addr, struct ppc_inst instr
> {
> int err = 0;
>
> - __put_user_asm(ppc_inst_val(instr), patch_addr, err, "stw");
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> -
> - asm ("dcbst 0, %0; sync; icbi 0,%1; sync; isync" :: "r" (patch_addr),
> - "r" (exec_addr));
> + if (!ppc_inst_prefixed(instr)) {
> + __put_user_asm(ppc_inst_val(instr), patch_addr, err, "stw");
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + asm ("dcbst 0, %0; sync; icbi 0,%1; sync; isync" :: "r"
> (patch_addr),
> + "r"
> (exec_addr));
> + } else {
> + __put_user_asm((u64)ppc_inst_suffix(instr) << 32 |
> ppc_inst_val(instr), patch_addr, err, "std");
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + asm ("dcbst 0, %0; sync; icbi 0,%1; sync; isync" :: "r"
> (patch_addr),
> + "r"
> (exec_addr));
> + }
can we keep these 2 lines out of conditions as it remains to be the same ?
if (err)
return err;
asm ("dcbst 0, %0; sync; icbi 0,%1; sync; isync" :: "r" (patch_addr), "r"
(exec_addr));
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-
> fixups.c
> index f00dd13b1c3c..5519cec83cc8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
> @@ -84,12 +84,13 @@ static int patch_feature_section(unsigned long value,
> struct fixup_entry *fcur)
> src = alt_start;
> dest = start;
>
> - for (; src < alt_end; src++, dest++) {
> + for (; src < alt_end; src = (void *)src +
> ppc_inst_len(ppc_inst_read(src)),
> + (dest = (void *)dest + ppc_inst_len(ppc_inst_read(dest)))) {
> if (patch_alt_instruction(src, dest, alt_start, alt_end))
> return 1;
> }
>
> - for (; dest < end; dest++)
> + for (; dest < end; dest = (void *)dest +
> ppc_inst_len(ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP)))
> raw_patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP));
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> index 52ddd3122dc8..8b285bf11218 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> @@ -1169,10 +1169,12 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const
> struct pt_regs *regs,
> unsigned long int imm;
> unsigned long int val, val2;
> unsigned int mb, me, sh;
> - unsigned int word;
> + unsigned int word, suffix;
> long ival;
>
> word = ppc_inst_val(instr);
> + suffix = ppc_inst_suffix(instr);
same here, I doubt it might break for ppc32.
-- Bala
> +
> op->type = COMPUTE;
>
> opcode = word >> 26;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
> index 6f3bcdcfc9c7..b704aebb099a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
> @@ -761,8 +761,8 @@ static int xmon_bpt(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> /* Are we at the trap at bp->instr[1] for some bp? */
> bp = in_breakpoint_table(regs->nip, &offset);
> - if (bp != NULL && offset == 4) {
> - regs->nip = bp->address + 4;
> + if (bp != NULL && (offset == 4 || offset == 8)) {
> + regs->nip = bp->address + offset;
> atomic_dec(&bp->ref_count);
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ static struct bpt *in_breakpoint_table(unsigned long nip,
> unsigned long *offp)
> if (off >= sizeof(bpt_table))
> return NULL;
> *offp = off % BPT_SIZE;
> - if (*offp != 0 && *offp != 4)
> + if (*offp != 0 && *offp != 4 && *offp != 8)
> return NULL;
> return bpts + (off / BPT_SIZE);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon_bpts.S b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon_bpts.S
> index ebb2dbc70ca8..09058eb6abbd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon_bpts.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon_bpts.S
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> #include <asm/asm-compat.h>
> #include "xmon_bpts.h"
>
> +/* Prefixed instructions can not cross 64 byte boundaries */
> +.align 6
> .global bpt_table
> bpt_table:
> - .space NBPTS * 8
> + .space NBPTS * 16
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-13 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-06 8:09 [PATCH v5 00/21] Initial Prefixed Instruction support Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 01/21] powerpc/xmon: Remove store_inst() for patch_instruction() Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 02/21] powerpc/xmon: Move out-of-line instructions to text section Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 6:45 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-09 6:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-09 7:26 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 03/21] powerpc: Change calling convention for create_branch() et. al Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 10:25 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-07 6:10 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-07 6:35 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 6:59 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 04/21] powerpc: Use a macro for creating instructions from u32s Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 6:40 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-07 8:27 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 05/21] powerpc: Use a function for getting the instruction op code Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-06 9:38 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 7:04 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-07 8:32 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-08 18:21 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-04-09 4:48 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 06/21] powerpc: Use an accessor for instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 07/21] powerpc: Use a function for byte swapping instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 7:42 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 08/21] powerpc: Introduce functions for instruction equality Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 7:37 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 09/21] powerpc: Use a datatype for instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 10:34 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 10:35 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-07 10:30 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-08 2:11 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 10/21] powerpc: Use a function for reading instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 10:42 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 11/21] powerpc: Define and use __get_user_instr{, inatomic}() Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 10:48 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-08 2:13 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 12/21] powerpc: Introduce a function for reporting instruction length Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 11:14 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-08 2:14 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 13/21] powerpc/xmon: Use a function for reading instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 11:30 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-08 2:18 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-09 5:04 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-09 5:14 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 14/21] powerpc/xmon: Move insertion of breakpoint for xol'ing Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 15/21] powerpc: Make test_translate_branch() independent of instruction length Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 16/21] powerpc: Enable Prefixed Instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 17/21] powerpc: Define new SRR1 bits for a future ISA version Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 18/21] powerpc64: Add prefixed instructions to instruction data type Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 9:52 ` Alistair Popple
2020-04-06 10:25 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-06 11:13 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-08 18:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-04-08 18:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-06 10:42 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 1:39 ` Alistair Popple
2020-04-06 11:04 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-13 12:04 ` Balamuruhan S [this message]
2020-04-15 4:40 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-15 8:14 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 19/21] powerpc: Support prefixed instructions in alignment handler Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 20/21] powerpc sstep: Add support for prefixed load/stores Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 11:29 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 21/21] powerpc sstep: Add support for prefixed fixed-point arithmetic Jordan Niethe
2020-04-09 6:39 ` [PATCH v5 00/21] Initial Prefixed Instruction support Christophe Leroy
2020-04-09 7:28 ` Jordan Niethe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=435c17d3180d560a723efcae42de351ae7152cb3.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=bala24@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).