From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dev.rtsoft.ru (unknown [85.21.88.2]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 549956884E for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:40:38 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <439837D4.7090304@ru.mvista.com> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:40:36 +0300 From: Vitaly Bordug MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew McClintock References: <438B379B.6090904@ru.mvista.com> <1133848163.7932.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1133848163.7932.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded list Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc32: Adds MPC885ADS, MPC866ADS and MPC8272ADS-specific platform stuff for fs_enet List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Matt, Matthew McClintock wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 10:00 -0700, Vitaly Bordug wrote: >> + mpc82xx_fcc1_pdata.dpram_offset = >> mpc82xx_fcc2_pdata.dpram_offset = (u32)cpm2_immr->im_dprambase; >> + mpc82xx_fcc1_pdata.fcc_regs_c = mpc82xx_fcc2_pdata.fcc_regs_c >> = (u32)cpm2_immr->im_fcc_c; > > I'm not sure if this has already been discussed, but what is stopping us > from including this in the platform definition files along with the > other offsets? IIRC, because these values could vary along the PQ2 family, when all the stuff in pq2_devices.c should be static and applicable to any PQ2 which does have the corresponding device. > > -Matthew > > -- Sincerely, Vitaly