From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from amanaus.varma-el.com (unknown [195.144.244.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.varma-el.com", Issuer "mail.varma-el.com" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7D8688D9 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:18:05 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <43ABCED6.2030008@varma-el.com> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:17:58 +0300 From: Andrey Volkov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pantelis Antoniou References: <43A98F90.9010001@varma-el.com> <43AAEE12.5030009@varma-el.com> <200512222033.40156.pantelis.antoniou@gmail.com> <43ABA972.4080701@varma-el.com> <43ABAB69.4060703@intracom.gr> In-Reply-To: <43ABAB69.4060703@intracom.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Andrew Morton , Jes Sorensen , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> > > [snip] > >> >> Agree, I couldn't see nothing better for a basement of generic dev. >> alloc. >> >> So, it will be much better if it will be moved to lib/. >> >> Anyone have some more comments about subj. ? >> > > Sure, but the call has to be made be a core developer. > > Andrew? Pantelis, what did you think about renaming rheap.c and rh_xxx, to something like dev_xxx, since, for example, rh_alloc overlapped with __rh_alloc (__RegionHach__alloc) in the drivers/md/dm-raid1.c. -- Regards Andrey Volkov