From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hellhawk.shadowen.org (hellhawk.shadowen.org [80.68.90.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hellhawk.shadowen.org", Issuer "hellhawk.shadowen.org" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A5968A78 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:02:23 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <43C67B3F.3080301@shadowen.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:52:31 +0000 From: Andy Whitcroft MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala References: <20060112144437.GA15923@shadowen.org> <65FBDB60-D4A5-40DF-BA73-AB6388A9368B@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <65FBDB60-D4A5-40DF-BA73-AB6388A9368B@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc oprofile G4 clashes with wacom driver List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Kumar Gala wrote: > How about a different prefix than POT_. POT_ doesn't make me think of > PPC oprofile at all. How about PPC_OPROFILE_ or POWERPC_OPROFILE_ Paul? I am ambivalent about the prefix, and it can be trivially changed to any that you feel approriate. -apw