From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel] prom_init: Fetch flatten device tree from the system firmware
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 11:03:26 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43f037c57eed8ad2175470c940917dced947bb70.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190530193736.GC31586@gate.crashing.org>
On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 14:37 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 05:09:06PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > so, it is sort-of nack from David and sort-of ack from Segher, what
> > happens now?
>
> Maybe what we really need just a CI call to get all properties of a node
> at once? Will that speed up things enough?
>
> That way you need no change at all in lifetime of properties and how they
> are used, etc.; just a client getting the properties is a lot faster.
Hrm... if we're going to create a new interface, let's go for what we
need.
What we need is the FDT. It's a rather ubiquitous thing these days, it
makes sense to have a way to fetch an FDT directly from FW.
There is no use for the "fetch all properties" cases other than
building an FDT that any of us can think of, and it would create a more
complicated interface than just "fetch an FDT".
So I go for the simple one and agree with Alexey's idea.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-31 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-01 3:42 [PATCH kernel] prom_init: Fetch flatten device tree from the system firmware Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-05-02 4:27 ` David Gibson
2019-05-03 0:10 ` Stewart Smith
2019-05-03 2:35 ` David Gibson
2019-05-06 2:21 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-05-03 15:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-05-03 15:32 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-05-30 7:09 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-05-30 19:37 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-05-31 1:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2019-06-02 23:23 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-06-03 2:56 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-06-03 21:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-06-03 23:49 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-06-04 0:32 ` David Gibson
2019-06-03 23:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-06-04 0:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-06-04 5:00 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43f037c57eed8ad2175470c940917dced947bb70.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).