From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from master.soleranetworks.com (master.soleranetworks.com [67.137.28.188]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCB4679EB for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2006 04:49:05 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <442D7790.2010300@wolfmountaingroup.com> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:40:16 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linas Vepstas Subject: Re: [PATCH]: e1000: prevent statistics from getting garbled during reset. References: <20060330213928.GQ2172@austin.ibm.com> <20060331000208.GS2172@austin.ibm.com> <442C8069.507@wolfmountaingroup.com> <20060331003506.GU2172@austin.ibm.com> <442CACC0.1060308@wolfmountaingroup.com> <20060331170319.GV2172@austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20060331170319.GV2172@austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, john.ronciak@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Jeff Garzik List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Linas Vepstas wrote: >On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:14:56PM -0700, Jeffrey V. Merkey wrote: > > >>Yes, we need one. The adapter needs to maintain these stats from the >>registers in the kernel structure and not >>its own local variables. >> >> > >Did you read the code to see what the adapter does with these stats? >Among other things, it uses them to adaptively modulate transmit rates >to avoid collisions. Just clearing the hardware-private stats will mess >up that function. > > > I noticed that. >>That way, when someone calls to clear the stats >>for testing and analysis purposes, >>they zero out and are reset. >> >> > >1) ifdown/ifup is guarenteed to to clear things. Try that. > > No, not dynamic. I'll patch the driver locally, thanks. Jeff >2) What's wrong with taking deltas? Typical through-put performance >measurement is done by pre-loading the pipes (i.e. running for >a few minutes wihtout measuring, then starting the measurement). >I'd think that snapshotting the numbers would be easier, and is >trivially doable in user-space. I guess I don't understand why >you need a new kernel featre to imlement this. > >--linas > > >