hi,
yes,you are right.the usleep didn't give out accurate delay.so I make a delay funtion to fix it.
thank you for you help.:)
regards
tony
That depends on how accurate you want. Sleep() functions can't be too accurate
for Linux schedule characteristic. To get best accuracy, you can use hardware
timer. udelay() is a choice which reduces the overall system performance.
Best Regards,
Leo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com@ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com@ozlabs.org] On Behalf
> Of tony
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:24 PM
> To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Subject: delay programming
>
>
> hi all
> I want to delay 1ms in the program,
> does usleep(1000) works accurate?
> any good idea?
>
> regards
> tony
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
你 不 想 试 试 今 夏 最 “酷” 的 邮 箱 吗 ?
蕴 涵 中 华 传 统 文 化 于 世 界 一 流 科 技 之 中,创 新 Ajax 技 术,126 “D 计 划”火 热 体 验 中 !