From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com (terminus.zytor.com [192.83.249.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE9A67B16 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 01:43:12 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4485A279.4050403@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:42:49 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Base address of executables - weirdness? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I'm trying to track down an odd issue with klibc on ppc32. Until recently, binaries linked with ld defaulted to a base address of 0x10000000+SIZEOF_HEADERS. However, recently I've gotten a couple of reports -- and I've been able to confirm this on my FC5 system -- that some versions of ld links at 0x01800000+SIZEOF_HEADERS. Needless to say, this is more than a bit confusing, *especially* since "ld -verbose" still reports: PROVIDE (__executable_start = 0x10000000); . = 0x10000000 + SIZEOF_HEADERS; ... at the top of the linker script. I'm rather baffled. Has anyone else seen this, and/or have any other explanation? -hpa