From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <44A29AF5.4010501@shadowen.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:06:29 +0100 From: Andy Whitcroft MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm2 References: <449D5D36.3040102@google.com> <449FF3A2.8010907@mbligh.org> <44A150C9.7020809@mbligh.org> <20060628034215.c3008299.akpm@osdl.org> <20060628034748.018eecac.akpm@osdl.org> <44A29582.7050403@google.com> In-Reply-To: <44A29582.7050403@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Andrew Morton , jeremy@goop.org, drfickle@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@mbligh.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 03:42:15 -0700 >> Andrew Morton wrote: >> >> >>> his is caused by the vsprintf() changes. Right now, if you do >>> >>> snprintf(buf, 4, "1111111111111"); >>> >>> the memory at `buf' gets [31 31 31 31 00], which is not good. >>> >>> This'll plug it, but I didn't check very hard whether it still has any >>> off-by-ones, or if breaks the intent of Jeremy's patch. I think it's >>> OK.. > > > Aha, you're a genius! How the hell did you figure that one out? > > Andy / Steve ... any chance one of you could kick this through the > harness? Against -git10 or so, I'd think > > Thanks, Suitibly kicked ... against 2.6.17-git10. -apw