From: Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@de.ibm.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: "Thomas Klein" <tklein@de.ibm.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
"Christoph Raisch" <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
"Marcus Eder" <meder@de.ibm.com>,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ehea: interface to network stack
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:43:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44E09A19.9050205@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060814143842.GM479@krispykreme>
Hi,
Anton Blanchard wrote:
>> Is a conditional cheaper than a divide? In case of a misprediction I
>> would assume it to be significantly slower and I don't know the ratio
>> of mispredictions for this branch.
>
> A quick scan of the web shows 40 cycles for athlon64 idiv, and its
> similarly slow on many other cpus. Even assuming you mispredict every
> branch its going to be a win.
>
> Anton
as our queue size is always a power of 2, we simply use:
i++;
i &= (ringbufferlength - 1)
So we can get along without the if.
Jan-Bernd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-14 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-09 8:38 [PATCH 1/6] ehea: interface to network stack Jan-Bernd Themann
2006-08-09 9:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2006-08-11 11:02 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2006-08-09 13:06 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-08-10 14:49 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2006-08-10 6:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-08-10 7:30 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-08-10 14:28 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2006-08-11 20:56 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-08-14 11:26 ` Jörn Engel
2006-08-14 14:38 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-08-14 15:43 ` Jan-Bernd Themann [this message]
2006-08-14 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44E09A19.9050205@de.ibm.com \
--to=ossthema@de.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=meder@de.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raisch@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tklein@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).