From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net (srv5.dvmed.net [207.36.208.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6542C67BE7 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:22:27 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <44FEE7A8.1050904@garzik.org> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:22:16 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [2.6.19 PATCH 1/7] ehea: interface to network stack References: <200609041237.46528.ossthema@de.ibm.com> <20060904201606.GA24386@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <200609042311.21202.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <200609042311.21202.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Thomas Klein , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev , linux-kernel , Christoph Raisch , linux-ppc , Marcus Eder , Francois Romieu List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Am Monday 04 September 2006 22:16 schrieb Francois Romieu: >>> +#include "ehea.h" >>> +#include "ehea_qmr.h" >>> +#include "ehea_phyp.h" >> Afaik none of those is included in this patch nor in my 2.6.18-git tree. > > > They are in 5, 3 and 2, respectively > >> Happy bissect in sight. > > The driver should get merged as a single commit anyway, even > if split diffs are posted for review. Even if it gets merged > like this, bisect will work since the Kconfig option is added > in the final patch. That's impossible, in the form they were submitted...