From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net (srv5.dvmed.net [207.36.208.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2945467B59 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:19:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <451096FE.1000104@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:18:54 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove powerpc specific parts of 3c509 driver References: <20060919145433.8fc7d478.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20060919184243.GL29167@austin.ibm.com> <45103C62.4080003@genesi-usa.com> <1158708269.6002.186.camel@localhost.localdomain> <488875E7-CCBC-47E1-A273-A2D037A997B2@kernel.crashing.org> <45109203.6060606@pobox.com> <1192ED41-329C-4CB0-AD87-B3BF62EC4337@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <1192ED41-329C-4CB0-AD87-B3BF62EC4337@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Stephen Rothwell , ppc-dev , netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> Sure, PCI busses are little-endian. But is readX()/writeX() for PCI >>> only? >> >> Yes. >> >> For other buses, use foo_writel(), etc. > > Can this please be documented then? Never heard this before... You have come late to the party. This has been the case for many, many years. And there is no point in a massive rename to pci_writel(), either. Jeff