From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB72C433DB for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0831264E24 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:18:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0831264E24 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dmly832nZz3d4S for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:18:24 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=KWIlIT6W; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=KWIlIT6W; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dmlxd4CPWz3cYP for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:17:56 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PL3L9d191222; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:17:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=Gw0IEjknbMH0QCu1NRzsc/4MbGba4x97bqNNSLB62/I=; b=KWIlIT6Wywfzvb2HiELCGWp8jLvr2NZcn/SmSUHdXrzl61GA/NGpwVhlduSYyfkDoPFo Lp+gNx0m0P4B6qcavHNGO53y9TGdX/xNDfz8feitbnU789hNWMkeOKFspWUJ1q7NIYD2 QM373E0mEIdQSJSRKxq5dqhcdtSy89PTjeEsp1f+Ku2zChsepcBFSbOVlKC82AJG9apu 7CHFEqTFQLvS2aWktEOjLMkl3Asjsbxy5a9OyydCyG5P4H7Bqq6xSVEkS6PNOVyc+32t +CnHkA4T1Ia9ZKPaDoqHapS/Z+wDJ2ZCKqQ+iSKhc9u/PdbcRaid5UPCJkYcik3nRFXK 6g== Received: from ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (b.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.11]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xf2v049j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:17:53 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PL7smN027901; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:17:53 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.24]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36v5y9mk8k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:17:53 +0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PLHqfn42860868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:17:52 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26ED6AE05F; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:17:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E204AE060; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:17:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc6034535106.ibm.com (unknown [9.211.123.159]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:17:51 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ibmvfc: reinitialize sub-CRQs and perform channel enquiry after LPM To: Tyrel Datwyler , james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com References: <20210225204824.14570-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> <20210225204824.14570-6-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> From: Brian King Message-ID: <451323f3-e778-81d0-38e9-5f098ed3426c@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:17:50 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225204824.14570-6-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_14:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250161 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 2/25/21 2:48 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote: > A live partition migration (LPM) results in a CRQ disconnect similar to > a hard reset. In this LPM case the hypervisor moslty perserves the CRQ > transport such that it simply needs to be reenabled. However, the > capabilities may have changed such as fewer channels, or no channels at > all. Further, its possible that there may be sub-CRQ support, but no > channel support. The CRQ reenable path currently doesn't take any of > this into consideration. > > For simpilicty release and reinitialize sub-CRQs during reenable, and > set do_enquiry and using_channels with the appropriate values to trigger > channel renegotiation. > > Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler > --- > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c > index 4ac2c442e1e2..9ae6be56e375 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c > @@ -903,6 +903,9 @@ static int ibmvfc_reenable_crq_queue(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) > { > int rc = 0; > struct vio_dev *vdev = to_vio_dev(vhost->dev); > + unsigned long flags; > + > + ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(vhost); > > /* Re-enable the CRQ */ > do { > @@ -914,6 +917,16 @@ static int ibmvfc_reenable_crq_queue(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost) > if (rc) > dev_err(vhost->dev, "Error enabling adapter (rc=%d)\n", rc); > > + spin_lock_irqsave(vhost->host->host_lock, flags); > + spin_lock(vhost->crq.q_lock); > + vhost->do_enquiry = 1; > + vhost->using_channels = 0; > + > + ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost); > + > + spin_unlock(vhost->crq.q_lock); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags); ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs can sleep, for multiple reasons, so you can't hold a lock when you call it. There is a GFP_KERNEL allocation in it, and the patch before this one adds an msleep in an error path. Thanks, Brian -- Brian King Power Linux I/O IBM Linux Technology Center