From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C12A679E1 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 01:29:32 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <453CDFDA.6090104@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:29:30 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH] qe_ic: Do a sync when masking interrupts. References: <20061019180308.GA24256@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <17724.15919.790114.628418@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <453CDD70.9010100@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <453CDD70.9010100@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Scott Wood wrote: > Note that many/most interrupt controller drivers don't even do that > much; they just have more fortuitous timing than the QE (and/or the > spurious interrupt is non-cascaded, and thus gets caught in > handle_level_irq and doesn't increment the spurious interrupt count). Ignore that last bit about non-cascaded interrupts; if it makes a difference at all, it's because of added delays (getting back to the fortuitous timing thing). -Scott