From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from imap.sh.mvista.com (unknown [63.81.120.155]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FDC68126 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:32:25 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <45411B46.9060106@ru.mvista.com> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:32:06 +0400 From: Sergei Shtylyov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vitaly Wool Subject: Re: [1/2] build failure for E500 CPUs w/ CONFIG_OPROFLE=y References: <20061026104338.99e89782.vwool@ru.mvista.com> <4A3EAE00-3647-4B72-8CDF-ED6E0ADEC910@kernel.crashing.org> <1161894389.2820.14.camel@barja> In-Reply-To: <1161894389.2820.14.camel@barja> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev list , oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello. Vitaly Wool wrote: > Hello Kumar, >>This makes sense to me since we are just increasing kernel code size >>for code we would never use for an FSL_BOOKE part if we do it the >>other way. I dont think its that much more messy with the ifdef's. > Okay, if you're fine with this patch, is it possible that you include it > into your tree? >>If you want to do the other cleanup as well I've got no issue with >>that, but we really should NOT build in support for 7450 into a >>FSL_BOOKE kernel when reasonably avoidable. > That's fine with me. > As of the cleanups, well... looks to me some more patches will follow > soon, kinda bugfixing ones rather than cleanups first :) The most funny/stupd thing is that the patch existed since May but it never went in: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=5531 > Thanks, > Vitaly WBR, Sergei