From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from trider-g7.fabbione.net (trider-g7.fabbione.net [195.22.207.161]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7396067C17 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 07:44:23 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4547B59D.6010305@ubuntu.com> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:44:13 +0100 From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: glibc-2.5 test suite hangs/crashes the machine References: <45419F79.2020300@ubuntu.com> <1162177334.25682.144.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4545E38B.5010702@ubuntu.com> <1162240610.25682.182.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45471B94.9070606@ubuntu.com> <1162326609.25682.332.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1162326609.25682.332.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeff Bailey , Paul Mackerras , Ben Collins List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 10:47 +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >>> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 12:35 +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: >>>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >>>>> Does that patch fixes it ? >>>>> >>>> tested with kernel .17 and headers from .19 and the build hangs. Still tons of >>>> Zl processes around. >>>> >>>> On the note building with kernel .19 and .19 headers it all goes smooth. >>> Ok, so there's a different issue from what I've found. You haven't by >>> chance noted what those processes are (which test case typically) ? >>> Also, there's a sysrq to get a backtrace of all pending processes, >>> though I don't remember which one off the top of my mind, might be >>> useful to have a look though. >>> >>> Ben. >>> >> After discussing with Ben on IRC i applied 69588298188b40ed7f75c98a6fd328d82f23ca21 >> to kernel .17 and glibc does build without zombie processes and no hang whatsoever. >> >> I suggest to push this patch back to the stable kernel trees. > > It also need the alignment bits I did though. > > Ben. > I did apply that one too to .17 as we agreed for the test. Fabio -- I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse.