From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net
	[151.189.21.49])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mx.arcor.de",
	Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK))
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F036679E9
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:31:16 +1000 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <20060919201053.GP29167@austin.ibm.com>
References: <20060919193020.GN29167@austin.ibm.com>
	<72674737-8325-48FA-B04F-C4ADCA2E2BF9@kernel.crashing.org>
	<20060919201053.GP29167@austin.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <457DC43D-0895-45BD-A292-76F5FC7783EB@kernel.crashing.org>
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: powerpc: clarify use of twi/isync in io macros
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:30:57 +0200
To: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, paulus@samba.org,
	ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

> My moral fiber did twinge before I hit the send button,
> but I confused it with a muscle spasm.

Heh.

> Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>

The other way around, or change mine to a From: -- you took my
stuff, not the other way around.  Oh well, doesn't matter as
far as I'm concerned.  Some people think that keeping the chain
in the correct order is very important though.  Let's just say
it was a cooperative work and fool them all :-)


Segher