linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
To: grant.likely@secretlab.ca
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [POWERPC] Make it blatantly clear;	mpc5200 device tree is not yet stable
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:14:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B07DF1.6020301@246tNt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1169190014769-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Acked-by: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>


It's purely documentation so quite unlikely to break stuff ;) And it's
real important people know it.



PS: Grant, it's 246 in my email not 346 ;)

grant.likely@secretlab.ca wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>
> Documentation-only change.  The 5200 device tree layout has not yet
> stablized, so nobody should depend on the layout of the tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> ---
> Paul,
>
> (minor rework from comments received)
>
> I know it's *very* late in the .20 release cycle, but I don't want to
> allow false assumptions about the stability of the 5200 device tree
> bindings.
>
> Please apply for 2.6.20 If you think it is appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
> g.
>
>  .../powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt       |    6 ++++++
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts                 |    6 ++++++
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts                |    6 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt
> index 7fb3b8a..69f016f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt
> @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ MPC52xx Device Tree Bindings
>  (c) 2006 Secret Lab Technologies Ltd
>  Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
>  
> +********** DRAFT ***********
> +* WARNING: Do not depend on the stability of these bindings just yet.
> +* The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
> +* Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
> +********** DRAFT ***********
> +
>  I - Introduction
>  ================
>  Boards supported by the arch/powerpc architecture require device tree be
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts
> index a8efb59..1868707 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts
> @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
>   * option) any later version.
>   */
>  
> +/*
> + * WARNING: Do not depend on this tree layout remaining static just yet.
> + * The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
> + * Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
> + */
> +
>  / {
>  	model = "Lite5200";
>  	compatible = "lite5200\0lite52xx\0mpc5200\0mpc52xx";
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts
> index 1aabee4..5bb2760 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts
> @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
>   * option) any later version.
>   */
>  
> +/*
> + * WARNING: Do not depend on this tree layout remaining static just yet.
> + * The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
> + * Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
> + */
> +
>  / {
>  	model = "Lite5200b";
>  	compatible = "lite5200b\0lite52xx\0mpc5200b\0mpc52xx";
>   

      reply	other threads:[~2007-01-19  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-19  7:00 [POWERPC] Make it blatantly clear; mpc5200 device tree is not yet stable grant.likely
2007-01-19  8:14 ` Sylvain Munaut [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45B07DF1.6020301@246tNt.com \
    --to=tnt@246tnt.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).