From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (de01egw01.freescale.net [192.88.165.102]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A274DDE48 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 03:16:16 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <45C75844.9000309@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 10:16:04 -0600 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rmcguire@videopresence.com Subject: Re: MPC8360 : PCI resource allocate error References: <000c01c746db$6451e7e0$6405a8c0@absolut> <06A02CF1-7D0C-4D59-9628-A2EB0FF3CCF4@kernel.crashing.org> <001101c746e3$5b8dab00$6405a8c0@absolut> <000601c74754$b9a1eb90$6405a8c0@absolut> In-Reply-To: <000601c74754$b9a1eb90$6405a8c0@absolut> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Russell McGuire wrote: > Yes, actually of the 6 cards I have, all are seen except the USB card. > And the USB card is seen in all other slots. So it appears to be a SLOT > issue, but not a card issue. Somehow this card is unique and uncovering an > error that I don't know about yet. Perhaps I have a single address line > sizzled or something. This is the same slot that has the IO resource > allocation problems; I don't think I need to debug that in Linux. It could also be a card ordering problem. In the x86 world, I've seen issues where a particular card had to be located at a higher/lower PCI slot than some other card. However, my guess is that the USB card depends on a particular pin that none of your cards uses, and that pin is busted in slot 3. -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale