From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <timur@freescale.com>
Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net
	[192.88.165.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25254DDF93
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:10:08 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <45CCFF4B.7000102@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:10:03 -0600
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: Discussion about iopa()
References: <989B956029373F45A0B8AF02970818900D444B@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net>
	<1170969965.2620.345.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<0640B069-F05E-4A08-A8EB-C277BEF1466E@embeddedalley.com>
	<1171058780.6578.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<1EFFAE36-7396-45B5-B8F2-DD7348FBE385@kernel.crashing.org>
	<45CCFAD6.5070807@freescale.com>
	<7B89E9E3-620C-4DF5-96E7-AF05287D89DC@kernel.crashing.org>
In-Reply-To: <7B89E9E3-620C-4DF5-96E7-AF05287D89DC@kernel.crashing.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Kumar Gala wrote:

> It doesn't seem like it's that big of a change.  I'd rather the code 
> clearly do different things for MURAM vs system memory for ALL accesses.

Why?  MURAM acts like RAM, it just needs to be mapped first.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale