From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (de01egw01.freescale.net [192.88.165.102]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8DEDDDE6 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:40:56 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <45D632F3.3000509@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:40:51 -0600 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: What happened to include/asm-ppc?? References: <32201137.34111171657512254.JavaMail.root@vms061.mailsrvcs.net> <200702162150.44997.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <200702162150.44997.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Arnd Bergmann wrote: > That shouldn't be the case, the headers from asm-powerpc should be > sufficient for all 32 and 64 bit user apps, if not then you should > really report that as a bug. I thought applications weren't supposed to include kernel header files? -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale