From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6124ADDED9 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:51:44 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <45E5C128.7020204@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:51:36 -0600 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Malek Subject: Re: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices References: <45E46976.6060600@freescale.com> <29c13109971547687159078eacdea008@kernel.crashing.org> <45E592DC.9060700@freescale.com> <511cacb7bbe8a65ff72738c84ec9ece4@kernel.crashing.org> <45E5B604.904@freescale.com> <46F6BF70-2922-4E05-8DAB-6B0830B0AB47@embeddedalley.com> <45E5BD6B.1010509@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Torben.Mathiasen@hp.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Segher Boessenkool , linux-ppc-embedded List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dan Malek wrote: > I'd shoot that down, too. Using udev in an > embedded, reliable environment is very > troublesome. Although, products I've > developed using more than 4 UARTs had > some custom /dev work done to it just > to get everything mapped. My only > concern is we don't add a new range for > QE UARTs, that we use the same minors > for both CPM and QE. Then it appears that the only possible solution is to assign numbers 46 - 53 to the CPM/QE and accept that it overlaps with the Altix. Is everyone okay with that? -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale