From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from imap.sh.mvista.com (unknown [63.81.120.155]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E9BDE10C for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 08:21:38 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <45EF2CD8.3050804@ru.mvista.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:21:28 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [patch 2/6 -rt] powerpc 2.6.20-rt8: to convert spinlocks to raw ones. References: <45EECE5C.6030100@ru.mvista.com> <17902.60669.945986.186995@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <45EEF6A4.9090807@ru.mvista.com> <17903.4302.502364.126701@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <17903.4302.502364.126701@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello. Paul Mackerras wrote: >> As I said, this was intended for the -rt patch, hence the question was for >>Ingo. I CC'ed the list just to keep people here in a loop. > OK, fair enough, but I still think the patch description was > inadequate. In the -rt context, I would at least expect to see some > explanation as to why those particular locks needed to be converted. I've floowed up to my patch with such explanation. In the context of an-rt patch itself, it was just too clear, hence I didn't go into explanations in the patch itself. :-) > Paul. WBR, Sergei