From: "Akshay Mishra" <akshaymishra@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org, kpoole@mrv.com
Subject: kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 ( mpc852t)
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:40:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <460643480604210810t23d8845erdd4500adf4882839@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
What processor frequency do you use ? The EP board for 852T uses 10
MHz OSCM and CLKIN. We were trying 66 MHz earlier and 25Mhz after
that. But never got any results. The hardware is clean afaik. and the
memory timing is more critical on the MPC8280 on the same board and it
works very well.
We tried changing the clock source to oscillator/crystal and slowing
the clockout to the SDRAM to verify if memory access were a problem.
But no result there too.
The kernel we have is 2.4.21. Will migrating to 2.6 make lives any better ?
Best,
Akshay
----------Quoting Kenneth
We have been experiencing this same issue with random boards in
production. The exact same version of software will run for months on
other instances of the exact same board design, but a few percent get
'random' trap 300s. When they do occur, it's only after Linux has booted
and address translation and caching are turned on. Examining the oops-es
and memory shows that some location in SDRAM has a bogus value, but I
don't have the tools to trace back how it got that way.
I have ported a rigorous moving-inversions memory test into our
firmware, and have run it extensively across the entire SDRAM address
space (the test code executes from flash). I have let this test run
continuously for hours and hours, but never found a memory problem.
Unfortunately, I do not have test software that enables the MMU address
translation or caching, so as Mark said, I can't test memory using
bursting. Our hardware engineers have reviewed the designs very
carefully and are quite confident that there is plenty of margin in the
memory timing. Signal quality has also been carefully checked.
Our manufacturing people have replaced the CPU on some of these boards,
and the problem went away.
If anyone else on the mailing list has experienced this issue, or has
developed a virtual address memory test, please let us know.
Ken Poole
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-21 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-21 15:10 Akshay Mishra [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-19 14:33 kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 ( mpc852t) Rune Torgersen
2006-04-19 12:58 Kenneth Poole
2006-04-19 13:45 ` Mark Chambers
2006-04-17 11:35 Akshay Mishra
2006-04-11 14:06 Oops: " gautam borad
2006-04-11 14:39 ` Mark Chambers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=460643480604210810t23d8845erdd4500adf4882839@mail.gmail.com \
--to=akshaymishra@gmail.com \
--cc=kpoole@mrv.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).