linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Dan Malek <dan@embeddedalley.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: change rheap functions to use long integers instead of pointers
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:20:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4613FA75.206@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5BBB288E-3E8D-4513-B75A-101CC8950F86@embeddedalley.com>

Dan Malek wrote:

> How about just leaving it alone?  

Panto said a while back that using unsigned long instead of void * is better.

 > A void * is
> perfectly valid as rheap could be used to manage
> any address space. 

And therefore, it shouldn't be a pointer, because that implies that it can be 
dereferenced.  An unsigned long is a better type to use for a generic value than a void 
pointer.

> you are reducing
> it's capability (by taking it's object management
> outside of the kernel virtual space), 

Sorry, I don't understand that.

> and you are
> introducing concerns for error conditions of
> current users.

I'm fixing those by changing the type from long to ulong and using IS_ERR_VALUE().

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-04 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-03 16:02 [PATCH] powerpc: change rheap functions to use long integers instead of pointers Timur Tabi
2007-04-04 16:42 ` Kumar Gala
2007-04-04 17:36   ` Pantelis Antoniou
2007-04-04 17:42   ` Timur Tabi
2007-04-04 18:00     ` Sylvain Munaut
2007-04-04 18:05       ` Timur Tabi
2007-04-04 18:13       ` Timur Tabi
2007-04-04 19:15         ` Dan Malek
2007-04-04 19:20           ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2007-04-04 19:31             ` Sylvain Munaut
2007-04-04 18:13       ` Scott Wood
2007-04-04 18:19         ` Timur Tabi
2007-04-04 18:24           ` Scott Wood
2007-04-04 18:27             ` Timur Tabi
2007-04-04 18:31               ` Scott Wood
2007-04-04 18:34                 ` Timur Tabi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4613FA75.206@freescale.com \
    --to=timur@freescale.com \
    --cc=dan@embeddedalley.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=tnt@246tNt.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).