From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (de01egw01.freescale.net [192.88.165.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C03DDF6B for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:36:17 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <461E51EA.90600@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:36:10 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bootwrapper: Add CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE References: <20070326205145.GA2868@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070326205226.GB2931@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <17949.47307.827348.233684@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <17949.47307.827348.233684@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Paul Mackerras wrote: > Hmmm, I'm not sure that I want to be asked about CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE on > *all* powerpc platforms... Surely this option should depend on > something that says we're including support for a uBoot-able platform? That's how I originally had it, but I was asked to make it more general. One non-uboot usage is Mark Greer's "Add Makefile rule to wrap dts file in zImage" patch. What about a CONFIG_WANT_DEVICE_TREE that platforms can select if they want to ask the user for a device tree? -Scott