From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB49DDDE47 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:35:49 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4624F75C.8060606@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:35:40 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfgang Denk Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] bootwrapper: Add ppcboot.h. References: <20070417090342.3E736352658@atlas.denx.de> In-Reply-To: <20070417090342.3E736352658@atlas.denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <20070416232553.GB26693@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> you wrote: >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/ppcboot.h b/arch/powerpc/boot/ppcboot.h >>new file mode 100644 >>index 0000000..5290ff2 >>--- /dev/null >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/ppcboot.h > > > Shouldn't we finally get this straight and call the file "u-boot.h" as > it is called in U-Boot? Probably... though the ppcboot.h name does reinforce the legacy nature of the interface. Maybe old-u-boot.h? Paul, feel free to change the name of the file in the patch if you want. -Scott