From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gianfar: Add I/O barriers when touching buffer descriptor ownership.
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 11:00:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <463A0732.2060802@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705022109350.1690@localhost.localdomain>
Kumar Gala wrote:
> So what about some thing like this where we do the read only once?
>
> - k
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> index a06d8d1..9cd7d1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
> @@ -1438,31 +1438,35 @@ int gfar_clean_rx_ring(struct net_device *dev, int rx_work_limit)
> {
> struct rxbd8 *bdp;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> - u16 pkt_len;
> + u16 pkt_len, status;
> + u32 bd_info;
I suggested that on IRC yesterday, and Segher was concerned that the
compiler might, in theory, "optimize" it into to two lhz instructions.
I'm rather skeptical that it would actually do so (even if it needs to
load twice due to register pressure, why not just use lwz both times?),
and there's probably many other places that would break if it did, but I
wasn't up for digging around GCC to prove otherwise.
Plus, that wouldn't synchronize the bd_info read with the buffer data reads.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-03 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 19:57 [PATCH v2] gianfar: Add I/O barriers when touching buffer descriptor ownership Scott Wood
2007-05-02 20:09 ` Kumar Gala
2007-05-02 20:12 ` Scott Wood
2007-05-02 20:20 ` Kumar Gala
2007-05-02 20:40 ` Scott Wood
2007-05-02 21:23 ` Kumar Gala
2007-05-02 21:30 ` Scott Wood
2007-05-03 2:10 ` Kumar Gala
2007-05-03 16:00 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2007-05-03 16:38 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-02 23:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-04 22:13 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-05-04 23:24 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-05 0:41 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=463A0732.2060802@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).