linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [DTC PATCH] Remove overreaching semantic tests.
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:51:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46488597.5060109@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070514011915.GH6517@localhost.localdomain>

David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:55:54PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>>I wouldn't be opposed to keeping these tests around if there were a
>>command line option that cleanly separates the errors/warnings into
>>classes such as structural, semantic-missing, semantic-broken, etc.
> 
> Exactly - which is why I really don't want to simply tear out this
> checking code.  I've never gotten around to reworking the
> error/warning system so it can sensibly divide things into such
> classes, and keep detecting further warnings after picking up some
> non-fatal ones and so forth.
> 
> I'd much prefer you just disable these tests for now, either by
> commenting code out, or removing calls to checking functions.  That
> will make it easier to optionally reinstate later.

Well, I figured the code would still be there in git, so getting it back 
wouldn't be too hard.  I can submit a patch that hides it behind a 
--warn-missing (or whatever) option, though.

-Scott

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-14 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-11 17:55 [DTC PATCH] Remove overreaching semantic tests Scott Wood
2007-05-14  1:19 ` David Gibson
2007-05-14 12:40   ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-14 15:51   ` Scott Wood [this message]
2007-05-15  0:57     ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46488597.5060109@freescale.com \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).