linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	i2c@lm-sensors.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [i2c] [PATCH] Make i2c-mpc driver use i2c_add_numbered_adapter
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:15:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <464B585B.10301@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705150828.37529.david-b@pacbell.net>

David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 14 May 2007 13:11:23 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> 
> 
>>>--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
>>>+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
>>>@@ -327,9 +327,10 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c);
>>> 
>>> 	i2c->adap = mpc_ops;
>>>+	i2c->adap.nr = pdev->id;
> 
> 
> By the way:  mpc_ops is a static i2c_adapter, so given that
> the reason for using pdev->id that way was that there might
> be more than one such platform device ... shouldn't allocation
> of the adapter be moved into allocation of the "i2c->" object?
> 
> Or at least, add a check to ensure that the static mpc_ops
> structure isn't in use before progressing this probe().

The mpc_ops struct is only used as a template; it gets copied into 
i2c->adap for each adapter instance.

-Scott

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-16 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-14 19:11 [PATCH] Make i2c-mpc driver use i2c_add_numbered_adapter Grant Likely
2007-05-14 19:32 ` Grant Likely
2007-05-15 13:26 ` [i2c] " Jean Delvare
2007-05-15 15:28   ` David Brownell
2007-05-15 15:51     ` Grant Likely
2007-05-15 16:05       ` David Brownell
2007-05-16 18:25         ` Jean Delvare
2007-05-16 18:38           ` Grant Likely
2007-05-16 19:15     ` Scott Wood [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=464B585B.10301@freescale.com \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).