From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D39DBDDE0D for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 09:44:14 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <46522EF1.6030804@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 01:44:49 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2hyaXN0aWFuIELDtmhtZQ==?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Interrupt routing broken on TiBook IV with 2.6.21.x ? References: <4650E27B.3020401@gmx.de> <1179712614.32247.597.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4651FC48.8000002@gmx.de> <1179785502.32247.748.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4652219D.6050308@gmx.de> <1179789304.32247.760.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1179789304.32247.760.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > I'm not sure what you are talking about here. DMA mapping has existed in > linux for years. I do admit that it's been a while since that last look ;) The topic came up when discussing PCI and bus systems in general with micro/real-time kernel people whom I assumed to be experts in this since they had Linux kernels running on top of their scheduling scheme. As it turned out, using an abstraction such as a DMA map was a totally new concept to them. They even questioned the usefulness of such an approach. Cheers, Christian