* Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3 [not found] <1425898222-19721-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> @ 2015-03-09 10:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2015-03-09 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2015-03-09 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; +Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > JFYI, when comparing v4.0-rc3[1] to v4.0-rc2[3], the summaries are: > - build errors: +18/-7 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: 'SMC91X_NOWAIT' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:47 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: 'SMC91X_USE_32BIT' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:11 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: 'SMC91X_USE_DMA' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:30 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: unknown field 'flags' specified in initializer: => 85:2 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: variable 'smc91x_platdata' has initializer but incomplete type: => 84:15 pxa255-idp_defconfig + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c: error: expected '}' before ';' token: => 198:43 lpd270_defconfig + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c: error: 'smc91c_platdata' undeclared (first use in this function): => 271:12 neponset_defconfig + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pleb.c: error: 'smc91c_platdata' undeclared here (not in a function): => 57:22 pleb_defconfig + /home/kisskb/slave/src/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'machine_has_neponset' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 2363:2 neponset_defconfig smc91x fallout. The lpd270_defconfig failure looks like not covered by "ARM: fix typos in smc91x platform data" yet? + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: error: 'SECTION_SIZE_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function): => 27:31 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error: 'PAGES_PER_SECTION' undeclared (first use in this function): => 1836:46, 1178:18 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error: 'PAGE_SECTION_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function): => 1177:20 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error: implicit declaration of function '__nr_to_section' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 1841:3 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_memory_block_hinted' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 1848:3 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'pfn_to_section_nr' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 1837:3 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/mm/memory_hotplug.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'present_section_nr' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 1838:3 powerpc-randconfig > [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/8557/ (255 out of 257 configs) > [3] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/8529/ (256 out of 257 configs) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3 2015-03-09 10:56 ` Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3 Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2015-03-09 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann 2015-03-09 14:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2015-03-09 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 09 March 2015 11:56:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > JFYI, when comparing v4.0-rc3[1] to v4.0-rc2[3], the summaries are: > > - build errors: +18/-7 > > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: > 'SMC91X_NOWAIT' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:47 > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: > 'SMC91X_USE_32BIT' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:11 > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: > 'SMC91X_USE_DMA' undeclared here (not in a function): => 85:30 > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: unknown > field 'flags' specified in initializer: => 85:2 > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: variable > 'smc91x_platdata' has initializer but incomplete type: => 84:15 > > pxa255-idp_defconfig > > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c: error: expected > '}' before ';' token: => 198:43 > > lpd270_defconfig > > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c: error: > 'smc91c_platdata' undeclared (first use in this function): => 271:12 > > neponset_defconfig > > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pleb.c: error: > 'smc91c_platdata' undeclared here (not in a function): => 57:22 > > pleb_defconfig > > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c: error: > implicit declaration of function 'machine_has_neponset' > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 2363:2 > > neponset_defconfig > > smc91x fallout. The lpd270_defconfig failure looks like not covered by > "ARM: fix typos in smc91x platform data" yet? It's not? This should be part of that patch: --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static struct resource smc91x_resources[] = { }; struct smc91x_platdata smc91x_platdata = { - .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT; + .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT, }; static struct platform_device smc91x_device = { and I thought I had tested all defconfigs as well as hundreds of randconfigs (the right ones) successfully this time. Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3 2015-03-09 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann @ 2015-03-09 14:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2015-03-09 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: >> smc91x fallout. The lpd270_defconfig failure looks like not covered by >> "ARM: fix typos in smc91x platform data" yet? > > It's not? > > This should be part of that patch: > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static struct resource smc91x_resources[] = { > }; > > struct smc91x_platdata smc91x_platdata = { > - .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT; > + .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT, Ah OK. Sorry, I thought there was a different reason. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-09 14:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1425898222-19721-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
2015-03-09 10:56 ` Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3 Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-03-09 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-09 14:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).