From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (de01egw01.freescale.net [192.88.165.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF83DDF55 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 02:18:26 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <467801CA.4090907@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:18:18 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: for-2.6.23 branch in powerpc.git created References: <18034.6787.951861.623265@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <4672D694.5060701@freescale.com> <18039.30713.948665.48880@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <18039.30713.948665.48880@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Guennadi Liakhovetski List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Paul Mackerras wrote: >>I assume you mean "Call of_register_i2c_devices() for fsl-i2c" >>(http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-May/036333.html)? > > > Isn't that the one where you replied to yourself saying you'd posted > the wrong patch? Did you ever post the right patch? I did, but discussion ensued, and the consensus was that the original patch is the way to do it. -Scott