From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (de01egw01.freescale.net [192.88.165.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50445DDEFD for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 01:07:32 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <467FDA2C.8020607@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:07:24 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix MAC address entries for 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx device trees References: <11825407952085-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <70d005ce549921cc56481fe0b26faaa4@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <70d005ce549921cc56481fe0b26faaa4@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Shouldn't you use the "??" notation instead, or is that > still not implemented? I just tested the very latest dtc, and it does not support ??. > [I would have preferred if you had removed "address" right > away (replaced by "mac-address"), but since it is marked > for removal anyway, that's fine with me]. My initial patch removed address and mac-address, but Kumar reminded me that we don't want to break things so quickly. I didn't want to run any regression tests on all these platforms and versions to see which obsolete properties could be removed from which DTS. -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale