From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix MAC address entries for 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx device trees
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:01:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <467FE6E5.1070403@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05ae4090f00e42580b7dcbf0619cc0b7@kernel.crashing.org>
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Yup, they're both marked for removal so let's just remove them
> at the same time.
As soon as Paul creates a "for-2.6.25" branch, that's when I was planning on doing it.
> Does the kernel provide a warning to users of too-old firmware^Wuboot
> telling them to update btw?
Nope. The current U-Boot code updates mac-address and/or local-mac-address, whichever
ones exist. If neither exists, it doesn't do anything. If both exists, it updates both
with the same value. This makes it DTS-agnostic, so to speak.
The kernel looks at each of the properties and uses the first one that has a valid MAC
address. Again, this is U-Boot- and DTS-agnostic.
Some older U-Boots would panic if the property it looks for didn't exist. Some Linux
drivers would simply not find a MAC address and then fail to load.
In other words, the current U-Boot and Linux code is written to not care what the other
one does. I have no plans to remove the code in the kernel that looks for obsolete
entries (I'm talking about function of_get_mac_address), because it's "safe".
However, now that you mention it, I could update function of_get_mac_address() to display
a warning if it only finds the 'address' property. That property is definitely wrong and
should never be in the DTS or any device tree passed to the kernel.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-25 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-22 19:33 [PATCH] powerpc: fix MAC address entries for 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx device trees Timur Tabi
2007-06-23 15:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 12:50 ` Josh Boyer
2007-06-25 15:07 ` Timur Tabi
2007-06-25 15:46 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 16:01 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2007-06-26 7:40 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-26 15:22 ` Timur Tabi
2007-06-26 15:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-26 15:58 ` Timur Tabi
2007-06-25 16:19 ` Jon Loeliger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=467FE6E5.1070403@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).