linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: paulus@samba.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Executing from readablee, no-exec pages
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:55:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <468D68D4.4050704@freescale.com> (raw)

As revealed by the recent "Prevent data exception in kernel space" 
patch, versions of glibc prior to 2.4[1] assume that, on powerpc32, they 
can execute out of any readable mapping, regardless of whether it is 
marked for execution.  This happens in the elf_machine_load_address() 
function.

To maintain compatibility with these versions, we could change the test 
in do_page_fault() to include VM_READ as well as VM_EXEC on targets that 
don't have a separate exec-bit in hardware (are there any powerpc mmus 
that do?).  However, Segher suggested on IRC that we may want to drop 
compatibility with those old versions of glibc, and that I should seek 
your input.

Personally, I'd rather stick the VM_READ in there, partially for selfish 
reasons (our root filesystems are based on older glibcs), and because it 
seems a little too soon to deprecate glibc 2.3, but also because in the 
absence of hardware support, the VM_EXEC check will be nondeterministic, 
kicking in only when the first fault for a page is to execute.

-Scott

[1] It's possible that there are other instances of this in 2.4 and that 
the actual version is newer; I ran into obnoxious cross compilation 
issues trying to try it.  However,

<rant>
Glibc already has target-specific code/headers; if you need to know 
something that you'd otherwise need a runs-on-the-target autoconf test 
for, why not just stick it in such a target-specific header?  In this 
case, it was trying to figure out the size of "long double".
</rant>

             reply	other threads:[~2007-07-05 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-05 21:55 Scott Wood [this message]
2007-07-05 22:38 ` Executing from readablee, no-exec pages Rodrigo Rubira Branco
2007-07-06 11:18 ` Johannes Berg
2007-07-06 13:36   ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-07-06 13:43     ` Johannes Berg
2007-07-06 13:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-07-06 16:49   ` Scott Wood
2007-07-07  2:33     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-06 14:42 ` David Woodhouse
2007-07-07  2:33   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=468D68D4.4050704@freescale.com \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).