From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F7FDE305 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:17:09 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <469E3CFE.9020903@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:17:02 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/61] Use strcasecmp() rather than strncasecmp() when determining device node compatibility. References: <20070718013137.GA15217@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <99CD25DB-EAAC-4CF3-AB14-D825AD11E499@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <99CD25DB-EAAC-4CF3-AB14-D825AD11E499@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Kumar Gala wrote: > Can these patches be broken into logical clumps? Probably... I just wanted to get them out there quickly as there've been numerous people lately inquiring about 82xx support and posting patches. > Would be easier to review and obviously the fs_enet patches need to go > via jeff and netdev. While I don't think there'll be a build break if the ethernet patches go in separately, there'll be a functional breakage, so I don't want to send them to Jeff until I'm confident that the rest of the patches will be going in the same release. -Scott