From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D06DDF6E for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:31:50 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <469E6AA0.7030805@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:31:44 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vitaly Bordug Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/61] mpc885ads: Rework initialization. References: <20070718013137.GA15217@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070718013600.GR15238@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070718124402.18197206@localhost.localdomain> <469E4267.2040001@freescale.com> <20070718222455.423ee0ba@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20070718222455.423ee0ba@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Vitaly Bordug wrote: >>The conflict is in register space, not pins -- why would the smc1 >>pins matter? > > ok, I may have confused this with something else. Possibly the conflict between FEC2 and SMC2 (which is still done via kconfig option)? -Scott