From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180F4DDF3C for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:56:12 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <469FB3C4.8070909@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:56:04 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH 49/61] 8xx: Update device trees. References: <20070718013604.GU15238@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070719205745.57f9d5a0@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Since you are using generic names, the only use for the "name" > of a node is for a human reader to understand your tree. Maybe > everyone using this specific SoC knows what a BCSR is; or maybe > there is a more friendly name you could use. It's the standard term used in Freescale board documentation. I could change it to board-control, though. -Scott