From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net (srv5.dvmed.net [207.36.208.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B27DDE3F for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:18:15 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <46AE0F36.8030605@garzik.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:17:58 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan-Bernd Themann , David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic References: <200707301724.33865.ossthema@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200707301724.33865.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Thomas Klein , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev , linux-kernel , linux-ppc , Christoph Raisch , Marcus Eder , Andrew Gallatin , Stefan Roscher List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Seems pretty good to me, save for one minor detail: patches #1/#2 should be combined together for greater git-bisect happiness. Ditto for patches #3/#4. Largely harmless in this case, but keeps the git history pollution to a minimum. Caveat reviewer: I'm not an expert of net/ipv4/* code, so I reviewed largely from the driver API perspective. David, thoughts on merging? I'm not We could stick this into your tree or mine. Whether yours or mine, I would like to keep the driver and net-core patches together in the same git tree. Jeff