linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Thomas Klein <tklein@de.ibm.com>,
	Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@de.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@de.ibm.com>,
	Marcus Eder <meder@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4][RFC] lro: Kconfig and Makefile
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:00:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46AE192E.4080205@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46AE1383.3050305@garzik.org>

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> Why make this a user selectable option at all? Unless you want
>> to deal with out of tree drivers (not my problem), it should be hidden
>> to avoid having to explain an support it.
> 
> In this case it's an optional library kernel module.  That seems to be a 
> common setup for library modules.  We do the same with CONFIG_MII and 
> drivers/net/mii.ko as well.
> 
> Originally it was done purely in the Makefile, but that does not account 
> for net drivers in sub-directories (or out of tree as you point out).

speaking of that, shouldn't there be a NETIF_F_LRO ?

Auke

      reply	other threads:[~2007-07-30 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-30 15:24 [PATCH 2/4][RFC] lro: Kconfig and Makefile Jan-Bernd Themann
2007-07-30 16:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-07-30 16:36   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-30 17:00     ` Kok, Auke [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46AE192E.4080205@intel.com \
    --to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gallatin@myri.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=meder@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ossthema@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=raisch@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=themann@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tklein@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).